TutorTermTell Us What Is StuckGet in Touch

My results contradict my hypothesis. Is that bad?

No, and trying to hide it is much worse. A disconfirmed hypothesis honestly reported and thoughtfully discussed is a legitimate contribution. Reframing the question after the fact to match the result is a recognized problem and examiners are alert to it.

This comes up on Interpreting and Reporting Results, where it is answered in the context of the work itself.

Get My Free QuoteBrowse all questions

More on data analysis

See all
My two strands disagree. What do I do?Parametric or non-parametric?Should I code on paper first?What about mixed methods?What does it mean when Levene's test is significant?What goes in results and what goes in discussion?What is a good effect size to assume?What is a joint display?What is G*Power?What is saturation and how do I show I reached it?What is the difference between a code, a category and a theme?What makes a study mixed methods rather than just having two datasets?What test do I use for Likert scale data?Which design should I use?Will you just run my statistics for me?ANOVA or multiple t-tests?Can I run several tests on the same data?Can I use a web sample size calculator?Can I use tables straight from SPSS?Can NVivo find themes automatically?
Not what you asked?

Ask us the actual question

Send the draft, the rubric or the score report with it. You get a real answer and a price before you commit to anything.

Get My Free Quote[email protected]