How many sources should a literature review have?
There is no number, and any number quoted without reference to your field and your topic is invented. What matters is coverage: whether someone who knows the area would find anything important missing. A tightly argued review of forty well-chosen sources beats a loose one citing two hundred.
This comes up on Literature Review Support, where it is answered in the context of the work itself.
Not what you asked?
Ask us the actual question
Send the draft, the rubric or the score report with it. You get a real answer and a price before you commit to anything.